<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1808 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790739</link>
    <description>Where the sole substantial question of law in a tax appeal on unjust enrichment was already settled by a binding Supreme Court ruling in favour of the assessee, no independent question of law survived for adjudication. The Gujarat High Court therefore held that the appeals could not be sustained, as the governing controversy had already been resolved against the Revenue&#039;s position and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1808 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790739</link>
      <description>Where the sole substantial question of law in a tax appeal on unjust enrichment was already settled by a binding Supreme Court ruling in favour of the assessee, no independent question of law survived for adjudication. The Gujarat High Court therefore held that the appeals could not be sustained, as the governing controversy had already been resolved against the Revenue&#039;s position and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>