<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1814 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790745</link>
    <description>An adjudicatory order passed after remand was found unsustainable because it did not deal with the petitioner&#039;s replies, personal hearing submissions, or the earlier direction to pass a reasoned order addressing all contentions. The court treated this failure as a breach of fair hearing and of the remand mandate, making quashing appropriate. As the dispute had still not been decided on a proper basis, the proceedings were restored to the authority for de novo consideration after hearing both sides and for passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The merits of the dispute were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1814 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790745</link>
      <description>An adjudicatory order passed after remand was found unsustainable because it did not deal with the petitioner&#039;s replies, personal hearing submissions, or the earlier direction to pass a reasoned order addressing all contentions. The court treated this failure as a breach of fair hearing and of the remand mandate, making quashing appropriate. As the dispute had still not been decided on a proper basis, the proceedings were restored to the authority for de novo consideration after hearing both sides and for passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The merits of the dispute were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>