<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Natural justice in GST cancellation demands disclosure of relied-upon material before deciding revocation and related proceedings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99303</link>
    <description>Natural justice requires disclosure of relied-upon inspection material before deciding revocation of GST registration cancellation. The Court directed the authorities to furnish the inspection material, the director&#039;s letters, and the Chartered Accountant&#039;s letter through proper channel, allow the petitioner to file a supplementary reply, hear the petitioner, and then decide the pending revocation application. It also directed adjudication of the pending DRC-01 proceedings for the relevant tax period. No final determination on the merits of the cancellation was made; the operative emphasis was on a fair opportunity to meet the material relied upon before orders are passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Natural justice in GST cancellation demands disclosure of relied-upon material before deciding revocation and related proceedings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99303</link>
      <description>Natural justice requires disclosure of relied-upon inspection material before deciding revocation of GST registration cancellation. The Court directed the authorities to furnish the inspection material, the director&#039;s letters, and the Chartered Accountant&#039;s letter through proper channel, allow the petitioner to file a supplementary reply, hear the petitioner, and then decide the pending revocation application. It also directed adjudication of the pending DRC-01 proceedings for the relevant tax period. No final determination on the merits of the cancellation was made; the operative emphasis was on a fair opportunity to meet the material relied upon before orders are passed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>