<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1403 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468330</link>
    <description>A claim for selection grade that had already been declined and attained finality could not be revived through contempt or ancillary proceedings, and the petitioner&#039;s request was rejected. The earlier upholding of termination meant the related claims for pension, gratuity and allied retiral benefits did not survive as enforceable relief in the matter. A prior direction to consider compassionate allowance under Rule 69 of the CCS Pension Rules, 1972 was treated as complied with once the respondents passed a reasoned rejection, so no contempt survived. The writ-related applications and contempt proceedings were accordingly closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1403 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468330</link>
      <description>A claim for selection grade that had already been declined and attained finality could not be revived through contempt or ancillary proceedings, and the petitioner&#039;s request was rejected. The earlier upholding of termination meant the related claims for pension, gratuity and allied retiral benefits did not survive as enforceable relief in the matter. A prior direction to consider compassionate allowance under Rule 69 of the CCS Pension Rules, 1972 was treated as complied with once the respondents passed a reasoned rejection, so no contempt survived. The writ-related applications and contempt proceedings were accordingly closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>