<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1791 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468331</link>
    <description>Where pledged jewellery is alleged to be traceable to proceeds of crime, the appellate forum declined to interfere with the attachment because the pledgee&#039;s claim of bona fide pledge and first charge was not accepted on the available record. The absence of verified purchase receipts or cash memos supported continuation of the attachment, and the competing claims to release, auction, or realisation of dues were treated as matters for determination by the Special Judge in the pending prosecution complaint. Status quo regarding possession was maintained, and the appellant was left to pursue its claim before the trial forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1791 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468331</link>
      <description>Where pledged jewellery is alleged to be traceable to proceeds of crime, the appellate forum declined to interfere with the attachment because the pledgee&#039;s claim of bona fide pledge and first charge was not accepted on the available record. The absence of verified purchase receipts or cash memos supported continuation of the attachment, and the competing claims to release, auction, or realisation of dues were treated as matters for determination by the Special Judge in the pending prosecution complaint. Status quo regarding possession was maintained, and the appellant was left to pursue its claim before the trial forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>