https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790688 Detailed disclosure of the non-injurious price methodology is required before final anti-dumping findings are made, because that computation directly affects the dumping margin and injury assessment. Where only a bare format is disclosed and the interested party is denied a meaningful chance to comment, the defect is not cured by a later disclosure and the assessment is vitiated for breach of fair hearing. The text also notes that exclusion of semi-finished ophthalmic lenses with refractive index above 1.60 was upheld because they were not shown to be produced by the domestic industry and were not technically or commercially substitutable. en-us Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:16:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790688 Detailed disclosure of the non-injurious price methodology is required before final anti-dumping findings are made, because that computation directly affects the dumping margin and injury assessment. Where only a bare format is disclosed and the interested party is denied a meaningful chance to comment, the defect is not cured by a later disclosure and the assessment is vitiated for breach of fair hearing. The text also notes that exclusion of semi-finished ophthalmic lenses with refractive index above 1.60 was upheld because they were not shown to be produced by the domestic industry and were not technically or commercially substitutable. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790688