<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming Central Excise Duty demand, penalty, and interest against the appellants, manufacturers of V.P. Sugar and molasses. The Tribunal held that the amount received was not additional consideration under Proviso II to Section 4(1)(a), leading to the impugned order being set aside and the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming Central Excise Duty demand, penalty, and interest against the appellants, manufacturers of V.P. Sugar and molasses. The Tribunal held that the amount received was not additional consideration under Proviso II to Section 4(1)(a), leading to the impugned order being set aside and the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>