<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1783 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790714</link>
    <description>Receipts from the sale of old and unproductive rubber trees uprooted during replantation in a continuously cultivated plantation are agricultural income, because the character of the receipt depends on ongoing agricultural operations on the land. The sale was incidental to plantation agriculture and, being derived from trees removed as part of cultivation and maintenance, fell within section 2(1A) and was exempt under section 10(1). The fact that the assessee also carried on timber business did not alter the character of the receipt arising from its own agricultural operations, and authorities based on wild or spontaneously grown trees were held inapposite. The addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:16:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1783 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790714</link>
      <description>Receipts from the sale of old and unproductive rubber trees uprooted during replantation in a continuously cultivated plantation are agricultural income, because the character of the receipt depends on ongoing agricultural operations on the land. The sale was incidental to plantation agriculture and, being derived from trees removed as part of cultivation and maintenance, fell within section 2(1A) and was exempt under section 10(1). The fact that the assessee also carried on timber business did not alter the character of the receipt arising from its own agricultural operations, and authorities based on wild or spontaneously grown trees were held inapposite. The addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>