<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1795 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790726</link>
    <description>Dividend distribution tax under section 115-O was analysed as to whether it is a tax on the company&#039;s profits or on the shareholder&#039;s dividend income for India-UK treaty purposes. The text notes that earlier authorities, including a Supreme Court-approved Division Bench view, treated the levy as one on the company&#039;s profits, while a later Division Bench took a contrary position. Because the co-ordinate Bench decisions appeared irreconcilable, the controversy was considered fit for reference to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination on the correctness of the later view and whether it was per incuriam. No final ruling on tax liability or refund was given.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1795 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790726</link>
      <description>Dividend distribution tax under section 115-O was analysed as to whether it is a tax on the company&#039;s profits or on the shareholder&#039;s dividend income for India-UK treaty purposes. The text notes that earlier authorities, including a Supreme Court-approved Division Bench view, treated the levy as one on the company&#039;s profits, while a later Division Bench took a contrary position. Because the co-ordinate Bench decisions appeared irreconcilable, the controversy was considered fit for reference to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination on the correctness of the later view and whether it was per incuriam. No final ruling on tax liability or refund was given.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>