<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2274 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468322</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 is unsustainable where the Assessing Officer, after calling for details, accepts the assessee&#039;s explanation on the disputed transaction and makes no addition on that basis. The assessee produced bills, ledger extracts, bank records, tax deduction material and the counterparty&#039;s annual report to show that the amount was a business payment for loading and supervision charges, not an unsecured loan. A revisionary order cannot rest on a different factual premise, nor on a mere allegation of inadequate inquiry when the initial burden on the transaction has been discharged. The revision was therefore invalid and the order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:51:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2274 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468322</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 is unsustainable where the Assessing Officer, after calling for details, accepts the assessee&#039;s explanation on the disputed transaction and makes no addition on that basis. The assessee produced bills, ledger extracts, bank records, tax deduction material and the counterparty&#039;s annual report to show that the amount was a business payment for loading and supervision charges, not an unsecured loan. A revisionary order cannot rest on a different factual premise, nor on a mere allegation of inadequate inquiry when the initial burden on the transaction has been discharged. The revision was therefore invalid and the order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>