<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1806 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468329</link>
    <description>A review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 requires a demonstrable error apparent on the face of the record. The Court found that the record disclosed no such error and no other ground warranting review jurisdiction. On that basis, it held that no case for review had been made out and the petition was dismissed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1806 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468329</link>
      <description>A review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 requires a demonstrable error apparent on the face of the record. The Court found that the record disclosed no such error and no other ground warranting review jurisdiction. On that basis, it held that no case for review had been made out and the petition was dismissed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>