https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468312 The article examines whether non-impleadment of identifiable selected candidates and denial of notice before the Collector breached audi alteram partem, and whether later revision and writ proceedings could cure that defect. It also considers whether participation of relatives of the selection committee created a reasonable likelihood of bias and vitiated the selection. The discussion notes competing views: one treats the original denial of hearing as a complete procedural breach not cured by later limited proceedings, while the other considers subsequent hearings sufficient to remove prejudice. On bias, the article applies the principle that actual proof is unnecessary where circumstances show a real danger of bias. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:41:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468312 The article examines whether non-impleadment of identifiable selected candidates and denial of notice before the Collector breached audi alteram partem, and whether later revision and writ proceedings could cure that defect. It also considers whether participation of relatives of the selection committee created a reasonable likelihood of bias and vitiated the selection. The discussion notes competing views: one treats the original denial of hearing as a complete procedural breach not cured by later limited proceedings, while the other considers subsequent hearings sufficient to remove prejudice. On bias, the article applies the principle that actual proof is unnecessary where circumstances show a real danger of bias. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468312