<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1652 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790583</link>
    <description>Unilateral appointment of an arbitrator, jurisdictional nullity, limitation for objections to an arbitral award, and estoppel in public tender contracts are identified as the central legal points. The text records that the Special Leave Petition was dismissed and any pending applications were disposed of, but it does not provide the underlying reasoning or detailed outcome on the substantive issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:28:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1652 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790583</link>
      <description>Unilateral appointment of an arbitrator, jurisdictional nullity, limitation for objections to an arbitral award, and estoppel in public tender contracts are identified as the central legal points. The text records that the Special Leave Petition was dismissed and any pending applications were disposed of, but it does not provide the underlying reasoning or detailed outcome on the substantive issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>