<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1656 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790587</link>
    <description>Consultancy services used for feasibility studies and project designs for expansion, renovation and modernisation of an existing factory were treated as eligible input services for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal applied the post-1.4.2011 definition of input service and held that services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture remain covered, and the exclusion for services relating to setting up a factory cannot be read so broadly as to deny credit where the services are integrally connected with an existing manufacturing unit. Cenvat credit was therefore admissible, the demand was unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:10:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1656 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790587</link>
      <description>Consultancy services used for feasibility studies and project designs for expansion, renovation and modernisation of an existing factory were treated as eligible input services for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal applied the post-1.4.2011 definition of input service and held that services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture remain covered, and the exclusion for services relating to setting up a factory cannot be read so broadly as to deny credit where the services are integrally connected with an existing manufacturing unit. Cenvat credit was therefore admissible, the demand was unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>