https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790608 Condonation of a 36-day delay in filing a company petition was upheld because medical documents supported the pleaded ailment, the delay was not inordinate, and the power to condone was exercised pragmatically to advance adjudication on merits. The appellate objection that no opportunity was given to file a rejoinder did not undermine the material relied on by the Tribunal. The challenge failed because no clear perversity or legal error was shown in the condonation order. The objection to maintainability was kept open for decision in the main proceedings and did not affect the delay order. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790608 Condonation of a 36-day delay in filing a company petition was upheld because medical documents supported the pleaded ailment, the delay was not inordinate, and the power to condone was exercised pragmatically to advance adjudication on merits. The appellate objection that no opportunity was given to file a rejoinder did not undermine the material relied on by the Tribunal. The challenge failed because no clear perversity or legal error was shown in the condonation order. The objection to maintainability was kept open for decision in the main proceedings and did not affect the delay order. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790608