<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1678 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790609</link>
    <description>A short delay in filing a company petition under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 may be condoned where sufficient cause is shown by uncontroverted medical documents and the explanation of illness is not rebutted. The Tribunal treated the limitation scheme as operating within the Companies Act read with Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, and held that Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 could be invoked to meet the ends of justice unless expressly excluded by the special statute. The delay being brief and not prejudicial to adjudication on merits, condonation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1678 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790609</link>
      <description>A short delay in filing a company petition under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 may be condoned where sufficient cause is shown by uncontroverted medical documents and the explanation of illness is not rebutted. The Tribunal treated the limitation scheme as operating within the Companies Act read with Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, and held that Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 could be invoked to meet the ends of justice unless expressly excluded by the special statute. The delay being brief and not prejudicial to adjudication on merits, condonation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>