<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1704 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790635</link>
    <description>Rule 46A permits additional evidence at the appellate stage only in exceptional circumstances and requires the Commissioner (Appeals) to record written reasons showing that those conditions are met. It also obliges that the Assessing Officer be given a reasonable opportunity to examine the fresh material and produce rebuttal evidence, as part of natural justice. On the facts stated, no speaking order admitting the additional evidence was shown and no effective opportunity to rebut it was established. The admission and use of the evidence were therefore held invalid, the Tribunal&#039;s affirmation was unsustainable, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1704 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790635</link>
      <description>Rule 46A permits additional evidence at the appellate stage only in exceptional circumstances and requires the Commissioner (Appeals) to record written reasons showing that those conditions are met. It also obliges that the Assessing Officer be given a reasonable opportunity to examine the fresh material and produce rebuttal evidence, as part of natural justice. On the facts stated, no speaking order admitting the additional evidence was shown and no effective opportunity to rebut it was established. The admission and use of the evidence were therefore held invalid, the Tribunal&#039;s affirmation was unsustainable, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>