https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790652 The petitioner was required to pursue the statutory rectification remedy against the order-in-original and consequential recovery notice rather than seek immediate interference. The High Court noted the petitioner's claim of full discharge of tax liability and voluntary GST payment, but held that rectification before the proper officer was the appropriate course under the statute. It further directed that if the online portal did not permit filing of the rectification application, the respondent must accept the application manually and dispose of it within the stipulated time. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790652 The petitioner was required to pursue the statutory rectification remedy against the order-in-original and consequential recovery notice rather than seek immediate interference. The High Court noted the petitioner's claim of full discharge of tax liability and voluntary GST payment, but held that rectification before the proper officer was the appropriate course under the statute. It further directed that if the online portal did not permit filing of the rectification application, the respondent must accept the application manually and dispose of it within the stipulated time. Case-Laws GST Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790652