<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1724 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790655</link>
    <description>Blocking of Input Tax Credit could not survive once the petitioner&#039;s GST registration had been restored on verification. The earlier cancellation of registration had become academic, and the blocking order, being based solely on that cancellation, lost its foundation. The Input Tax Credit blocking was therefore quashed, and the petitioner was held entitled to utilise the credit in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1724 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790655</link>
      <description>Blocking of Input Tax Credit could not survive once the petitioner&#039;s GST registration had been restored on verification. The earlier cancellation of registration had become academic, and the blocking order, being based solely on that cancellation, lost its foundation. The Input Tax Credit blocking was therefore quashed, and the petitioner was held entitled to utilise the credit in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>