https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790661 An order passed under the GST framework was held unsustainable because the officer lacked lawful competence to act as a proper officer in the absence of the required Council recommendation and notification-based authorisation. The High Court treated the defect as one of jurisdiction, not mere procedure, and held that the availability of an alternate appellate remedy did not bar writ relief where the challenge was to an order passed wholly without authority. The impugned order was therefore quashed. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790661 An order passed under the GST framework was held unsustainable because the officer lacked lawful competence to act as a proper officer in the absence of the required Council recommendation and notification-based authorisation. The High Court treated the defect as one of jurisdiction, not mere procedure, and held that the availability of an alternate appellate remedy did not bar writ relief where the challenge was to an order passed wholly without authority. The impugned order was therefore quashed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790661