<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Permanent establishment through branch office continuity led to remand for fresh profit attribution and taxability review.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99245</link>
    <description>The branch office in India was treated as a continuation of the earlier liaison office, because the RBI approval and the nature of the upgraded arrangement showed an enlarged continuation of the existing presence rather than a new setup. On that basis, the Tribunal recorded that the branch office constituted a permanent establishment in India. As the taxability and profit attribution issues for the year were similar to those already remanded in earlier years, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination, including the assessee&#039;s claim that the branch office served only the machinery division.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Permanent establishment through branch office continuity led to remand for fresh profit attribution and taxability review.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99245</link>
      <description>The branch office in India was treated as a continuation of the earlier liaison office, because the RBI approval and the nature of the upgraded arrangement showed an enlarged continuation of the existing presence rather than a new setup. On that basis, the Tribunal recorded that the branch office constituted a permanent establishment in India. As the taxability and profit attribution issues for the year were similar to those already remanded in earlier years, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination, including the assessee&#039;s claim that the branch office served only the machinery division.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:29:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>