<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1598 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790529</link>
    <description>Imported manganese ore that had undergone washing, removal of waste, crushing and sizing was treated as manganese concentrate under Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, because conversion of ore into concentrate is deemed manufacture and the tariff scheme distinguishes ore from concentrate where foreign matter is removed for metallurgical use or economical transport. Applying its earlier ruling on similar facts and strict construction of the exemption notification, CESTAT held that the importer could not claim the benefit of Notification No. 04/2006-CE. The denial of exemption was therefore upheld and CVD liability followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1598 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790529</link>
      <description>Imported manganese ore that had undergone washing, removal of waste, crushing and sizing was treated as manganese concentrate under Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, because conversion of ore into concentrate is deemed manufacture and the tariff scheme distinguishes ore from concentrate where foreign matter is removed for metallurgical use or economical transport. Applying its earlier ruling on similar facts and strict construction of the exemption notification, CESTAT held that the importer could not claim the benefit of Notification No. 04/2006-CE. The denial of exemption was therefore upheld and CVD liability followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>