<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1606 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790537</link>
    <description>Once the foundational notification levying anti-dumping duty on titanium dioxide imports was quashed, any order-in-original confirming duty under that notification could not survive. The customs instruction issued after the Calcutta High Court ruling was not in dispute, and the demand based on the invalid notification was therefore unsustainable. Consequential refund of the duty already collected was warranted, and the amount was directed to be returned within 12 weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1606 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790537</link>
      <description>Once the foundational notification levying anti-dumping duty on titanium dioxide imports was quashed, any order-in-original confirming duty under that notification could not survive. The customs instruction issued after the Calcutta High Court ruling was not in dispute, and the demand based on the invalid notification was therefore unsustainable. Consequential refund of the duty already collected was warranted, and the amount was directed to be returned within 12 weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>