<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1607 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790538</link>
    <description>Delegated import restrictions become enforceable only on publication in the manner required by the parent statute, so a notification cannot bind goods that had already arrived before it was digitally signed and published. Because the consignment had landed before the restriction came into force, the notification could not operate retrospectively to deny transitional benefit or require import authorisation. The petitioner was therefore entitled to clearance of the goods without complying with the impugned restriction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1607 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790538</link>
      <description>Delegated import restrictions become enforceable only on publication in the manner required by the parent statute, so a notification cannot bind goods that had already arrived before it was digitally signed and published. Because the consignment had landed before the restriction came into force, the notification could not operate retrospectively to deny transitional benefit or require import authorisation. The petitioner was therefore entitled to clearance of the goods without complying with the impugned restriction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>