<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1627 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790558</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147 was held invalid because the recorded reasons rested on generalized Investigation Wing information and alleged accommodation transactions without independent verification, specific tangible material, or a live nexus showing escapement of income; the assessee&#039;s denial was not rebutted, so the jurisdictional condition of a valid reason to believe failed. Additions under sections 68 and 69A also failed because they were built mainly on third-party material and suspicion, without primary evidence of the assessee&#039;s participation, proof of the statutory ingredients of unexplained money, or meaningful cross-examination of relied-upon material. The reassessments were quashed and the additions deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1627 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790558</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147 was held invalid because the recorded reasons rested on generalized Investigation Wing information and alleged accommodation transactions without independent verification, specific tangible material, or a live nexus showing escapement of income; the assessee&#039;s denial was not rebutted, so the jurisdictional condition of a valid reason to believe failed. Additions under sections 68 and 69A also failed because they were built mainly on third-party material and suspicion, without primary evidence of the assessee&#039;s participation, proof of the statutory ingredients of unexplained money, or meaningful cross-examination of relied-upon material. The reassessments were quashed and the additions deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>