<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clear disclosure in GST DRC-01 required for proposed penalty; ambiguity vitiates adjudication and notice must be rectified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99216</link>
    <description>FORM GST DRC-01 must itself disclose the proposed tax, interest and penalty, because Rule 142 requires service of the statutory summary notice in the prescribed form and the noticee&#039;s right under Section 74(8) depends on clear particulars to make payment within time. A penalty demand cannot be sustained solely on recitals in an annexed detailed notice where no separate statutory form is prescribed. Ambiguity in DRC-01 as to the proposed penalty was a procedural defect and a breach of natural justice, which vitiated confirmation of penalty in the adjudication order. The order was set aside, and the authority was permitted to issue a rectified notice and proceed afresh after giving opportunity to the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clear disclosure in GST DRC-01 required for proposed penalty; ambiguity vitiates adjudication and notice must be rectified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99216</link>
      <description>FORM GST DRC-01 must itself disclose the proposed tax, interest and penalty, because Rule 142 requires service of the statutory summary notice in the prescribed form and the noticee&#039;s right under Section 74(8) depends on clear particulars to make payment within time. A penalty demand cannot be sustained solely on recitals in an annexed detailed notice where no separate statutory form is prescribed. Ambiguity in DRC-01 as to the proposed penalty was a procedural defect and a breach of natural justice, which vitiated confirmation of penalty in the adjudication order. The order was set aside, and the authority was permitted to issue a rectified notice and proceed afresh after giving opportunity to the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:21:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>