<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 148 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51371</link>
    <description>Customer-supplied patterns used in manufacturing castings were treated as part of the assessable value because the finished goods could not be produced without the moulds or patterns. In limitation, disclosure of purchase order numbers in price lists, together with the underlying purchase orders showing pattern and tooling charges and the retention-return arrangement, meant the department had access to the relevant facts. On that basis, suppression of facts with intent to evade duty was not made out, so the extended period of limitation was unavailable and only the normal period could be applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 148 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51371</link>
      <description>Customer-supplied patterns used in manufacturing castings were treated as part of the assessable value because the finished goods could not be produced without the moulds or patterns. In limitation, disclosure of purchase order numbers in price lists, together with the underlying purchase orders showing pattern and tooling charges and the retention-return arrangement, meant the department had access to the relevant facts. On that basis, suppression of facts with intent to evade duty was not made out, so the extended period of limitation was unavailable and only the normal period could be applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>