<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>&#039;Double standards&#039;: BJP&#039;??s Bansuri Swaraj attacks Kejriwal over Lodhi Estate bungalow</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72520</link>
    <description>Allegations were raised regarding the proposed interiors and furnishing of a government bungalow at Lodhi Estate, with claims that the design and amenities were inconsistent with the occupant&#039;s self-presentation as a common man. The criticism centred on alleged double standards, including assertions that earlier assurances against using government bungalows or vehicles were not followed and that the accommodation reflected an elite lifestyle rather than the stated public image. Questions were also raised over the alleged use of public or external resources for the bungalow, including claims of funding by a private firm and use of government funds during the Covid period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 17:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 17:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>&#039;Double standards&#039;: BJP&#039;??s Bansuri Swaraj attacks Kejriwal over Lodhi Estate bungalow</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72520</link>
      <description>Allegations were raised regarding the proposed interiors and furnishing of a government bungalow at Lodhi Estate, with claims that the design and amenities were inconsistent with the occupant&#039;s self-presentation as a common man. The criticism centred on alleged double standards, including assertions that earlier assurances against using government bungalows or vehicles were not followed and that the accommodation reflected an elite lifestyle rather than the stated public image. Questions were also raised over the alleged use of public or external resources for the bungalow, including claims of funding by a private firm and use of government funds during the Covid period.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 17:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>