<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 164 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51369</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs found short in stock and not reflected in statutory records had to be reversed, because credit cannot be retained on goods not used in or in relation to manufacture and the shortage was not accounted for in excise records. Non-disclosure of the shortage justified invocation of the extended period of limitation, so the demand was not time-barred. Penalty was nevertheless set aside because the shortage was small relative to total inputs and mala fide intention was not established on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 164 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51369</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs found short in stock and not reflected in statutory records had to be reversed, because credit cannot be retained on goods not used in or in relation to manufacture and the shortage was not accounted for in excise records. Non-disclosure of the shortage justified invocation of the extended period of limitation, so the demand was not time-barred. Penalty was nevertheless set aside because the shortage was small relative to total inputs and mala fide intention was not established on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>