https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51367 An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a pre-deposit condition was restored after the appellant later made the required deposit and complied with the stay order. The Tribunal accepted financial stringency as the reason for the delay and treated the partial payment already made as evidence of an intention to pursue the appeal. On that basis, the appeal was restored to its original number. en-us Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:22:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51367 An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a pre-deposit condition was restored after the appellant later made the required deposit and complied with the stay order. The Tribunal accepted financial stringency as the reason for the delay and treated the partial payment already made as evidence of an intention to pursue the appeal. On that basis, the appeal was restored to its original number. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51367