<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1517 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790448</link>
    <description>Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the interim moratorium under Section 96 arises only when a Section 94 or Section 95 petition is validly registered, not on mere filing or uploading, and it therefore operated from the date of registration. The absence of intimation to the secured creditor did not prevent the moratorium from coming into force, so the Debts Recovery Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the borrowers&#039; interim applications on that basis was unsustainable. Procedural lapses in the NCLT registry&#039;s scrutiny and refiling process also could not defeat the effect of a petition that had been registered, though any grievance of abuse or collusion could be pursued before the NCLT in appropriate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:51:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1517 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790448</link>
      <description>Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the interim moratorium under Section 96 arises only when a Section 94 or Section 95 petition is validly registered, not on mere filing or uploading, and it therefore operated from the date of registration. The absence of intimation to the secured creditor did not prevent the moratorium from coming into force, so the Debts Recovery Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the borrowers&#039; interim applications on that basis was unsustainable. Procedural lapses in the NCLT registry&#039;s scrutiny and refiling process also could not defeat the effect of a petition that had been registered, though any grievance of abuse or collusion could be pursued before the NCLT in appropriate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>