<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 257 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, following a directive from the High Court to apply Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act, allowed the condonation of delay application despite discrepancies in filing dates and incomplete documentation. The majority opinion held that the delay in filing the appeal was to be condoned, and the application for condonation of delay was granted, directing the appeal to proceed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:18:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 257 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, following a directive from the High Court to apply Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act, allowed the condonation of delay application despite discrepancies in filing dates and incomplete documentation. The majority opinion held that the delay in filing the appeal was to be condoned, and the application for condonation of delay was granted, directing the appeal to proceed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>