https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51364 The Tribunal rejected the applications for rectification of mistakes, concluding that there were no clear errors of law or fact. It held that its order was based on the correct application of Supreme Court decisions and legal principles, emphasizing that dismissal of an appeal by the Supreme Court resulted in the merger of orders and created a binding precedent. The Tribunal found that the issues raised by the applicants did not warrant rectification as they did not demonstrate mistakes in the Tribunal's decision-making process. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:14:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51364 The Tribunal rejected the applications for rectification of mistakes, concluding that there were no clear errors of law or fact. It held that its order was based on the correct application of Supreme Court decisions and legal principles, emphasizing that dismissal of an appeal by the Supreme Court resulted in the merger of orders and created a binding precedent. The Tribunal found that the issues raised by the applicants did not warrant rectification as they did not demonstrate mistakes in the Tribunal's decision-making process. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51364