<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1558 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790489</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 requires a defect-free petition and an error apparent on the face of the record. The petition remained defective despite Registry communication, and the Court also found no such apparent error on review of the record. The review petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, with no basis made out to reopen the earlier decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1558 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790489</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 requires a defect-free petition and an error apparent on the face of the record. The petition remained defective despite Registry communication, and the Court also found no such apparent error on review of the record. The review petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, with no basis made out to reopen the earlier decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>