<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1560 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790491</link>
    <description>Under the new reassessment regime, a notice under section 148 cannot be issued where, on the date of issuance, the limitation period under the earlier regime had already expired. The text notes that for AY 2017-18 the six-year period ended on 31.03.2024, and a notice issued thereafter was treated as unsustainable because the extended period in section 149(1) was applied prospectively. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1560 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790491</link>
      <description>Under the new reassessment regime, a notice under section 148 cannot be issued where, on the date of issuance, the limitation period under the earlier regime had already expired. The text notes that for AY 2017-18 the six-year period ended on 31.03.2024, and a notice issued thereafter was treated as unsustainable because the extended period in section 149(1) was applied prospectively. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>