<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 255 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51361</link>
    <description>Modvat rules expressly excluded fuel from the provisions governing common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods, so credit on furnace oil used as fuel remained admissible. The assessee was therefore not required to reverse the credit or pay an equivalent amount merely because part of the final product was cleared without payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 255 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51361</link>
      <description>Modvat rules expressly excluded fuel from the provisions governing common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods, so credit on furnace oil used as fuel remained admissible. The assessee was therefore not required to reverse the credit or pay an equivalent amount merely because part of the final product was cleared without payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>