https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790504 A claim for differential GST reimbursement arising from a government works contract was not granted outright because proof of actual GST payment had not been furnished on the material then available. The Court recorded the respondents' stand that the claim could be examined if supporting documents were produced, and directed the petitioner to submit those documents within the fixed time. It further required the respondents to consider the reimbursement claim and pass orders in accordance with law within a stipulated period. The operative effect was a limited mandamus for time-bound reconsideration, not an immediate declaration of entitlement or monetary relief. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:51:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790504 A claim for differential GST reimbursement arising from a government works contract was not granted outright because proof of actual GST payment had not been furnished on the material then available. The Court recorded the respondents' stand that the claim could be examined if supporting documents were produced, and directed the petitioner to submit those documents within the fixed time. It further required the respondents to consider the reimbursement claim and pass orders in accordance with law within a stipulated period. The operative effect was a limited mandamus for time-bound reconsideration, not an immediate declaration of entitlement or monetary relief. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790504