<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasonable cause defeats tax audit penalty where a society&#039;s bona fide compliance lapse was found genuine and non-mala fide.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99163</link>
    <description>ITAT held that penalty for failure to obtain tax audit was not automatic where the assessee showed reasonable cause under section 271B. The society&#039;s initial year of operations, lack of professional guidance and infrastructure, rural background, and bona fide belief that audit under the Co-operative Societies Act was sufficient were accepted, especially as the explanation was neither false nor mala fide. The nil-income assessment and absence of adverse inference of suppression supported the genuineness of the explanation. On these facts, the Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable and deleted it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:51:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:51:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reasonable cause defeats tax audit penalty where a society&#039;s bona fide compliance lapse was found genuine and non-mala fide.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99163</link>
      <description>ITAT held that penalty for failure to obtain tax audit was not automatic where the assessee showed reasonable cause under section 271B. The society&#039;s initial year of operations, lack of professional guidance and infrastructure, rural background, and bona fide belief that audit under the Co-operative Societies Act was sufficient were accepted, especially as the explanation was neither false nor mala fide. The nil-income assessment and absence of adverse inference of suppression supported the genuineness of the explanation. On these facts, the Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable and deleted it.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:51:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>