https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51356 The Tribunal held that filing a reference application does not, by itself, suspend the operation of the order sought to be referred. As the questions framed in the reference application did not challenge the legal authority for the redemption direction, and no independent ground for stay was shown, the request to stay implementation of the earlier miscellaneous order was rejected. The application was dismissed, leaving the redemption relief order operative pending the reference proceedings. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:56:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51356 The Tribunal held that filing a reference application does not, by itself, suspend the operation of the order sought to be referred. As the questions framed in the reference application did not challenge the legal authority for the redemption direction, and no independent ground for stay was shown, the request to stay implementation of the earlier miscellaneous order was rejected. The application was dismissed, leaving the redemption relief order operative pending the reference proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51356