<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468272</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d) and 148 must rest on the original reasons and foundational material available at initiation; those reasons cannot be substituted by a later, different basis in the final order. Here, the notice alleged fictitious trading losses, but the final order shifted to sham dividend transactions, making the reassessment unsustainable. The Court also reiterated that reopening requires tangible information with a live link to a belief that income has escaped assessment, and the Assessing Officer cannot cure an initial absence of material by adding new allegations later. The writ petition succeeded and the reassessment proceedings were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 19:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468272</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d) and 148 must rest on the original reasons and foundational material available at initiation; those reasons cannot be substituted by a later, different basis in the final order. Here, the notice alleged fictitious trading losses, but the final order shifted to sham dividend transactions, making the reassessment unsustainable. The Court also reiterated that reopening requires tangible information with a live link to a belief that income has escaped assessment, and the Assessing Officer cannot cure an initial absence of material by adding new allegations later. The writ petition succeeded and the reassessment proceedings were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>