https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790437 A legal representative aggrieved by an arbitral award must challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because that Act is a complete code for arbitral remedies and provides the exclusive statutory route to set aside an award. The statutory scheme treats legal representatives as stepping into the shoes of the deceased party, with awards binding on persons claiming under the parties and arbitration agreements enforceable against them. Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure are therefore not available as alternative challenge mechanisms. The High Court's view against the appellant was affirmed. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Apr 2026 18:59:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790437 A legal representative aggrieved by an arbitral award must challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because that Act is a complete code for arbitral remedies and provides the exclusive statutory route to set aside an award. The statutory scheme treats legal representatives as stepping into the shoes of the deceased party, with awards binding on persons claiming under the parties and arbitration agreements enforceable against them. Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure are therefore not available as alternative challenge mechanisms. The High Court's view against the appellant was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790437