<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 216 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51353</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on a D.G. set installed and used in the factory could not be denied in full merely because part of the electricity generated was supplied to an adjacent unit; the credit had to be restricted proportionately to the electricity diverted outside the factory. Penalty and interest could not be imposed for a period before the relevant penal provisions came into force, so those demands were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 216 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51353</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on a D.G. set installed and used in the factory could not be denied in full merely because part of the electricity generated was supplied to an adjacent unit; the credit had to be restricted proportionately to the electricity diverted outside the factory. Penalty and interest could not be imposed for a period before the relevant penal provisions came into force, so those demands were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>