<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99128</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing comparables were tested on functional and factual suitability: India Tourism Development Corporation Limited was remanded for fresh examination because the loss-maker label was based on a misquoted record and profit had been shown in a relevant year; the healthcare segment of Inhouse Production Ltd. was directed to be included because segmental comparability was established; and Elbit Diagnostics Limited remained excluded because its operational circumstances made it an unsuitable comparable despite the persistent-loss reasoning failing. The Tribunal also directed working capital adjustment in line with the DRP&#039;s binding direction, accepted the assessee&#039;s no-risk status on a cost-plus, direction-driven model, and rejected objections to use of current-year data and the standard plus/minus 5 percent tolerance benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:12:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99128</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing comparables were tested on functional and factual suitability: India Tourism Development Corporation Limited was remanded for fresh examination because the loss-maker label was based on a misquoted record and profit had been shown in a relevant year; the healthcare segment of Inhouse Production Ltd. was directed to be included because segmental comparability was established; and Elbit Diagnostics Limited remained excluded because its operational circumstances made it an unsuitable comparable despite the persistent-loss reasoning failing. The Tribunal also directed working capital adjustment in line with the DRP&#039;s binding direction, accepted the assessee&#039;s no-risk status on a cost-plus, direction-driven model, and rejected objections to use of current-year data and the standard plus/minus 5 percent tolerance benefit.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:12:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>