<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bail Granted to Advocate in GST ITC Fraud Case, Where Advocate’s Role Limited to Compliance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16267</link>
    <description>Regular bail was considered in a GST input tax credit fraud prosecution against an advocate alleged to have filed returns for non-existent firms and to have facilitated wrongful availment of input tax credit. The allegations invoked offences under Section 132(1)(b) and Section 132(1)(c) of the Goods and Services Tax law, with the applicant asserting that his involvement was confined to compliance-related work and that the investigation had already concluded with the charge-sheet filed. The Court noted that the applicant&#039;s role appeared limited to compliance activities, he did not appear to be a major participant in the alleged conspiracy, and bail was considered subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:43:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bail Granted to Advocate in GST ITC Fraud Case, Where Advocate’s Role Limited to Compliance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16267</link>
      <description>Regular bail was considered in a GST input tax credit fraud prosecution against an advocate alleged to have filed returns for non-existent firms and to have facilitated wrongful availment of input tax credit. The allegations invoked offences under Section 132(1)(b) and Section 132(1)(c) of the Goods and Services Tax law, with the applicant asserting that his involvement was confined to compliance-related work and that the investigation had already concluded with the charge-sheet filed. The Court noted that the applicant&#039;s role appeared limited to compliance activities, he did not appear to be a major participant in the alleged conspiracy, and bail was considered subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:43:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>