<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1802 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468245</link>
    <description>Where appellants remain absent despite sufficient opportunities and notice sent to the address given in the appeal papers is returned unserved, the Tribunal may dismiss the appeals for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Applying the principle in Benny D&#039;Souza v. Melwin D&#039;Souza, the Tribunal stated that, in the absence of the appellants, dismissal must be confined to non-prosecution and cannot be on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1802 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468245</link>
      <description>Where appellants remain absent despite sufficient opportunities and notice sent to the address given in the appeal papers is returned unserved, the Tribunal may dismiss the appeals for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Applying the principle in Benny D&#039;Souza v. Melwin D&#039;Souza, the Tribunal stated that, in the absence of the appellants, dismissal must be confined to non-prosecution and cannot be on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>