<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1429 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790360</link>
    <description>A final fact-finding order must address all material contentions and issues raised by the parties; otherwise it may fail appellate scrutiny. Here, the Tribunal did not consider the appellant&#039;s entire factual matrix or deal with all the contentions raised, so the appellate court could not properly answer the questions arising from the impugned order. The matter was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh consideration, with opportunity to both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:52:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1429 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790360</link>
      <description>A final fact-finding order must address all material contentions and issues raised by the parties; otherwise it may fail appellate scrutiny. Here, the Tribunal did not consider the appellant&#039;s entire factual matrix or deal with all the contentions raised, so the appellate court could not properly answer the questions arising from the impugned order. The matter was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh consideration, with opportunity to both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>