https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790374 A successful resolution applicant cannot reopen homebuyers' claims through belated re-verification once the approved resolution plan period has expired, because claim verification under the insolvency framework rests primarily with the resolution professional and admitted claims already acted upon in the process should not be indefinitely revisited. Where the record showed banking payments, settlement documents, an allotment or builder-buyer agreement, and admission of claims in the creditors' list, the appellants' status as homebuyer-financial creditors was sufficiently established. On that basis, the appellants were entitled to allotment and consequential possession of the flats under the approved resolution plan, and the direction for further verification was inconsistent with the existing insolvency record. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:52:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790374 A successful resolution applicant cannot reopen homebuyers' claims through belated re-verification once the approved resolution plan period has expired, because claim verification under the insolvency framework rests primarily with the resolution professional and admitted claims already acted upon in the process should not be indefinitely revisited. Where the record showed banking payments, settlement documents, an allotment or builder-buyer agreement, and admission of claims in the creditors' list, the appellants' status as homebuyer-financial creditors was sufficiently established. On that basis, the appellants were entitled to allotment and consequential possession of the flats under the approved resolution plan, and the direction for further verification was inconsistent with the existing insolvency record. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790374