https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790375 Section 27 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code permits the Committee of Creditors to replace a resolution professional when the proposal has the requisite voting share, the proposed professional has given written consent, and no disqualifying disciplinary issue is shown. On the stated facts, the Committee of Creditors had approved replacement unanimously and the proposed professional had consented. Mere requests for project-related assurances, a qualified legal opinion, or subsequent engagement of counsel did not establish bias, conflict of interest, or misconduct. The Adjudicating Authority cannot substitute its own nominee for the Committee of Creditors' choice, and such interference was beyond jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:52:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790375 Section 27 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code permits the Committee of Creditors to replace a resolution professional when the proposal has the requisite voting share, the proposed professional has given written consent, and no disqualifying disciplinary issue is shown. On the stated facts, the Committee of Creditors had approved replacement unanimously and the proposed professional had consented. Mere requests for project-related assurances, a qualified legal opinion, or subsequent engagement of counsel did not establish bias, conflict of interest, or misconduct. The Adjudicating Authority cannot substitute its own nominee for the Committee of Creditors' choice, and such interference was beyond jurisdiction. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790375