<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 93 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51339</link>
    <description>Goods destroyed during mandatory quality control testing integral to manufacture were treated as not fully manufactured for excise purposes, so duty was not payable on that quantity. Unexplained shortage of finished goods in stock attracted duty because the assessee failed to prove reconditioning or remaking within the factory. Free samples removed without duty also attracted duty on removal, and penalty followed because no bona fide belief was shown to displace extended limitation, though the penalty was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 93 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51339</link>
      <description>Goods destroyed during mandatory quality control testing integral to manufacture were treated as not fully manufactured for excise purposes, so duty was not payable on that quantity. Unexplained shortage of finished goods in stock attracted duty because the assessee failed to prove reconditioning or remaking within the factory. Free samples removed without duty also attracted duty on removal, and penalty followed because no bona fide belief was shown to displace extended limitation, though the penalty was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>