<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1490 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790421</link>
    <description>Amounts received from a sister concern for software testing and development in the ordinary course of business were not treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The factual record showed that the payments were made for commercial services and were later adjusted against bills raised by the assessee, indicating a trade transaction rather than a loan or advance. The court also relied on the settled principle that trade advances arising from genuine business dealings fall outside deemed dividend, consistent with CBDT Circular No. 19/2017 clarifying that Section 2(22)(e) does not apply to commercial transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1490 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790421</link>
      <description>Amounts received from a sister concern for software testing and development in the ordinary course of business were not treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The factual record showed that the payments were made for commercial services and were later adjusted against bills raised by the assessee, indicating a trade transaction rather than a loan or advance. The court also relied on the settled principle that trade advances arising from genuine business dealings fall outside deemed dividend, consistent with CBDT Circular No. 19/2017 clarifying that Section 2(22)(e) does not apply to commercial transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>